[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: process output has become a bit random...
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: process output has become a bit random... |
Date: |
29 Jul 2004 16:58:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > Yes, that's it. Even though the very last line would appear to be a
> > > preview-latex internal bug. If you take a look at the run buffer
> > > (C-c C-l) and search for, say, "Snippet 8", you will find that some
> > > passages around the matches are replicated.
> > >
> > > It is probably some change in process.c or coding.c in the last
> > > month or so. If you use gcc-3.3.4, at least it does not seem to be
> > > gcc-3.4-related like I feared at first.
> >
> > The error first appears with version 1.431 of process.c.
>
> Could you try to set readmax to 1024 ?
>
> That may break UDP packet receive, but it isn't relevant for this case.
Could you also try the following patch (with readmax=4096).
I don't expect it to make a lot of difference, but just to rule out
the obvious...
*** process.c 19 Jul 2004 12:02:56 +0200 1.433
--- process.c 29 Jul 2004 16:46:31 +0200
***************
*** 4762,4777 ****
if (DATAGRAM_CHAN_P (channel))
{
int len = datagram_address[channel].len;
! nbytes = recvfrom (channel, chars + carryover, readmax - carryover,
0, datagram_address[channel].sa, &len);
}
else
#endif
if (proc_buffered_char[channel] < 0)
{
! nbytes = emacs_read (channel, chars + carryover, readmax - carryover);
#ifdef ADAPTIVE_READ_BUFFERING
! if (!NILP (p->adaptive_read_buffering))
{
int delay = XINT (p->read_output_delay);
if (nbytes < 256)
--- 4762,4777 ----
if (DATAGRAM_CHAN_P (channel))
{
int len = datagram_address[channel].len;
! nbytes = recvfrom (channel, chars + carryover, readmax,
0, datagram_address[channel].sa, &len);
}
else
#endif
if (proc_buffered_char[channel] < 0)
{
! nbytes = emacs_read (channel, chars + carryover, readmax);
#ifdef ADAPTIVE_READ_BUFFERING
! if (nbytes > 0 && !NILP (p->adaptive_read_buffering))
{
int delay = XINT (p->read_output_delay);
if (nbytes < 256)
***************
*** 4783,4789 ****
delay += READ_OUTPUT_DELAY_INCREMENT * 2;
}
}
! else if (delay > 0 && (nbytes == readmax - carryover))
{
delay -= READ_OUTPUT_DELAY_INCREMENT;
if (delay == 0)
--- 4783,4789 ----
delay += READ_OUTPUT_DELAY_INCREMENT * 2;
}
}
! else if (delay > 0 && (nbytes == readmax))
{
delay -= READ_OUTPUT_DELAY_INCREMENT;
if (delay == 0)
***************
*** 4802,4808 ****
{
chars[carryover] = proc_buffered_char[channel];
proc_buffered_char[channel] = -1;
! nbytes = emacs_read (channel, chars + carryover + 1, readmax - 1 -
carryover);
if (nbytes < 0)
nbytes = 1;
else
--- 4802,4808 ----
{
chars[carryover] = proc_buffered_char[channel];
proc_buffered_char[channel] = -1;
! nbytes = emacs_read (channel, chars + carryover + 1, readmax - 1);
if (nbytes < 0)
nbytes = 1;
else
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., (continued)
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., Kim F. Storm, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., David Kastrup, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., Ralf Angeli, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., David Kastrup, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., Ralf Angeli, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., David Kastrup, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., Kenichi Handa, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., David Kastrup, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., David Kastrup, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., Kim F. Storm, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random...,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., David Kastrup, 2004/07/29
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., David Kastrup, 2004/07/31
- Re: process output has become a bit random..., David Kastrup, 2004/07/29