[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Years in copyright notices
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Years in copyright notices |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:03:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:48:10PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> already up-to-date -- but changing the date format is apparently not
> necessary (according to Richard's post), and will result in many more
> conflicts.
>
> When we are changing a copyright notice, we should take the opportunity
> to add the centuries where those are missing.
Of course, but Kim's proposal seemed to include adding the centuries even to
those copyright notices that _don't_ otherwise need changing (which is many).
-Miles
--
/\ /\
(^.^)
(")")
*This is the cute kitty virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread.
- Re: Years in copyright notices, (continued)
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/06/21
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/06/22
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/22
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/23
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Miles Bader, 2004/06/23
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/23
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/24
- Re: Years in copyright notices,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Kevin Ryde, 2004/06/23