[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting) |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:50:47 -0400 |
> I said a while back that IMHO we should be a more structured project, in
> the sense of having a plan for releases, with tentative dates, perhaps
> even a release manager, etc.
Thanks for the suggestion, but I do not like the idea of going that
way.
(I think over time you would find yourself using
it too, though, as using it is often more efficient than avoiding it.)
If you think that I could "find myself" using a web-based system, you
must not understand the difficulty. If it is web based, I can't
access it. There is little chance I will "find myself" having a net
connection more of the time.
That is the reason for my decision that we will not use a web-based
system to hold data about Emacs development.
Please consider the decision final; let's not keep discussing the
matter.
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), (continued)
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), Jason Rumney, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), David Kastrup, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), Robert J. Chassell, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), Karl Fogel, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting), Robert J. Chassell, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking, Oliver Scholz, 2004/06/13
- Re: Bug tracking, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/14
- Re: Bug tracking, Tak Ota, 2004/06/14
- Re: Bug tracking, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/16
- Re: Bug tracking, Tak Ota, 2004/06/16
Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting),
Richard Stallman <=