[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Jun 2004 13:52:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, 28 May 2004, address@hidden wrote:
> next-error-no-visit: M-n
>
> Let's call that forward-error-message.
>
> previous-error-no-visit: M-p
>
> Let's call that backward-error-message.
Wouldn't that be confusing? We already have the prefixing adjectives
"next" and "previous" established, now users have to also remember
"forward" and "backward." I know Emacs already does it in many
places, but I think we should try to limit the number of adjectives
in this case.
> next-error-file-no-select: M-}, M-N
>
> I'd rather avoid defining M-N and M-P as different from M-n and M-p.
> We don't need to do it; M-{ and M-} are equally easy to type.
>
> Also, let's call these commands forward-error-source-file
> and backward-error-source-file.
Ditto as above.
Thanks
Ted
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/01
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/01
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/02
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/03
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/03
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/07
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/08
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/30