Re: display word wrapping

[Juanma Barranquero]

On Mon, 31 May 2004 19:55:53 +0200, "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> wrote:

> It isn't allowed to assume that.  AFAIK, unlike the `register'
> qualifier, `volatile' is not an advisory one, it's mandatory.

Yes. But unless I've made some kind of mistake (I'll recheck), the code
generated does not vary.

> But as Andreas points out, the declaration itself is incorrect.  If
> so, changing it to whatever is right should make a difference.  Here,
> try this:
> 
>      struct image * volatile img;
> 
> Did that work?

That's what I really tried, and no, it doesn't make any difference.


                                                           /L/e/k/t/u