[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails |
Date: |
Fri, 14 May 2004 05:20:41 -0400 |
This feature is not harmless, because often it causes a window system
to load unnecessary fonts to memory to display some unrelated characters.
And also when it displays strange characters, it confuses users.
Beginning users don't do lots of interactive Lisp evals, so I don't
think we need to worry so much about confusing them. Loading the
fonts might be a more serious issue. However, adding an option is a
very undesirable way to solve such a problem. It is costly in complexity
and will leave many users unsatisfied.
Can anyone think of another idea for how to avoid the problem?
- printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Peter Whaite, 2004/05/06
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/10
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/11
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/11
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/14
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, David Kastrup, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/18
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/19
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15