[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch |
Date: |
Sun, 09 May 2004 20:00:51 -0400 |
I still think that face-remapping should rely on face-inheritance rather
than allow mapping a face to several (merged) faces.
I am not quite sure what change you are proposing.
If you are saying that the feature of remapping X to (Y Z)
should be removed, and instead the user should have to
define W as (Y Z) then remap X to W, I think that is
a loss of convenience with nearly zero gain in simplicity.
- +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/05
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/06
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/07
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/07
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/10