[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IELM prompt
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: IELM prompt |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:27:31 -0500 (CDT) |
Juanma Barranquero wrote:
Personally, I think it'd be better to just do
(when (= (point-min) (point-max))
;; Add a silly header
(insert ielm-header)
...)
and *not* insert the header when restarting the process, just when the
*ielm* buffer is created the first time around.
Opinions?
The header in:
ELISP> C-c C-c
Process ielm interrupt
*** Welcome to IELM *** Type (describe-mode) for help.
ELISP>
gives an indication that the process was restarted. (Maybe it can be
argued that the new prompt already does that.) _Maybe_:
ELISP> C-c C-c
Process ielm interrupt
Process ielm restarted
ELISP>
might be better, but probably the repeated header is good enough.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/22
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/22
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/22
- Re: IELM prompt, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/04/23
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/23
- Re: IELM prompt, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/04/24
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/24
- Re: IELM prompt, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/04/24
- Re: IELM prompt,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: IELM prompt, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/04/25
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/25
- Re: IELM prompt, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/04/25
- Re: IELM prompt, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/24