[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Jumping to C source from *Help* |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:08:10 -0400 |
3 - Change switch-to-buffer to call pop-to-buffer rather than signal an
error and leave everything else unchanged.
I don't like the idea of making switch-to-buffer do different things
in interactive and noninteractive calls. And I don't like the idea
of making it switch windows.
In the case of a single dedicated window, splitting the window
and using one of the new windows does make sense in a way.
However, switching to another existing window just seems wrong.
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, (continued)
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/13
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/13
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/14
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/15
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/15
- RE: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Drew Adams, 2004/04/15
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/16
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, David Kastrup, 2004/04/16
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/16
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/17
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/19
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/18
- Re: Jumping to C source from *Help*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/19