[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). |
Date: |
16 Apr 2004 10:38:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> % cd .../emacs-trunk
> % cvs tag handa-temp-tag
> % cd .../emacs-unicode-2
> % cvs update -j emcas-unicode-2-base -j handa-temp-tag
> % cvs commit -m 'Sync to HEAD'
> % cd .../emacs-trunk
> % cvs tag -F -r handa-temp-tag emacs-unicode-2
Seems right (except for the `emcas' typo and the fact that the last command
should set emacs-unicode-2-base rather than emacs-unicode-2, but I expect
these were copy-errors and you use the right commands ;-).
> So, now all files in emacs-unicode-2 branch have arch tags.
> But, I've never used arch. Could you tell me the exact
> procedure to use arch for synchronizing?
Well, you'll have to create an Arch branch first.
> Is it surely easier than the above procedure for CVS?
Once the branch is setup, merging is much easier because the management of
emacs-unicode-2-base is basically all done for you. You'll just do
tla star-merge --three-way address@hidden/emacs--cvs-trunk--0
to merge in changes from the cvs-trunk.
> By the way, the last step above aborted as below.
> [...]
> T src/s/vms4-4.h
> T src/s/vms5-5.h
> T src/s/windows95.h
> T src/s/xenix.h
> cvs server: Tagging vms
> T vms/README
> T vms/make-mms-derivative.el
> cvs [server aborted]: "tag" requires write access to the repository
> Could someone tell me what it means?
No idea. Can you try again?
Since `cvs tag handa-temp-tag' worked, I'd assume that it was just
a transient bug. Otherwise, it means that some permissions are messed up,
which seems odd.
Stefan
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., (continued)
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/04/09
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/09
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/09
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/04/11
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/14
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/20
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/04/11
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/11
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/04/13
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/16
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/16
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/17
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/19
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/19
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/19
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/19
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/19
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/11
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/12
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/12