[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make-indirect-buffer
|
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
|
Subject: |
Re: make-indirect-buffer |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:12:05 -0500 (CDT) |
I erased the CC'c in my previous message:
Miles Bader wrote:
The error message is different -- you're treating NIL as a
string...
It seems to avoid calling Fget_buffer twice, you'd have to save the
previous
value of base_buffer and use it in the error message.
Yes. The question is whether calling Fget_buffer is expensive enough
to justify another variable.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- make-indirect-buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/12
- make-indirect-buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/12
- Re: make-indirect-buffer, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/12
- Re: make-indirect-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/12
- Re: make-indirect-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/04/12
- Re: make-indirect-buffer,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: make-indirect-buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/12
- Re: make-indirect-buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/12
- Re: make-indirect-buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/12
- Re: make-indirect-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/12
- Re: make-indirect-buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/12
- Re: make-indirect-buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/12
- Re: make-indirect-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/13