[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions* |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:14:44 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
>> Date: 29 Mar 2004 16:24:58 -0500
>>
>> So maybe dired should introduce new faces (maybe it's done that already,
>> I haven't used it in a while now)
>
> Dired still uses the standard font-lock faces, it does not define its
> own faces.
>
> I agree with Stefan that introducing Dired-specific faces is a good
> idea. Standard font-lock faces are suitable to programming
> languages, not to something like file types.
I always wished dired would have its own faces. How about the
following faces?
(defface dired-header
'((t (:inherit font-lock-type-face)))
:group 'dired)
(defface dired-mark
'((t (:inherit font-lock-constant-face)))
:group 'dired)
(defface dired-marked
'((t (:inherit font-lock-warning-face)))
:group 'dired)
(defface dired-warning
'((t (:inherit font-lock-comment-face)))
:group 'dired)
(defface dired-directory
'((t (:inherit font-lock-function-name-face)))
:group 'dired)
(defface dired-symlink
'((t (:inherit font-lock-keyword-face)))
:group 'dired)
(defface dired-ignored
'((t (:inherit font-lock-string-face)))
:group 'dired)
> Mode derived from Text Mode, like Texinfo and Mail modes, should
> probably also define their own faces.
Faces that have no semantic relation to the standard font-lock faces
should define their own faces.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, (continued)
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Juri Linkov, 2004/03/25
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/24
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/27
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/28
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/29
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/29
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/30
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/30
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/30
- Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Miles Bader, 2004/03/31
Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*, Lars Hansen, 2004/03/25