[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:25:13 -0500 |
> I chose the M-g binding for that reason, and the reason continues to
> have force. So I don't intend to change that binding.
I can't see the particular mnemonic value of that binding.
M-g is not mnemonic. It is not a very good binding, but it seemed to
be the best that was available. If you can suggest a better binding
for the text property commands, I could agree to moving them.
AUCTeX has for its font selection commands C-c C-f C-t (for example,
for switching to typewriter).
That's okay for AUCTeX because it is a major mode, but it would not be
allowed for a global binding. Anyway, it is one extra character,
which is not very nice. Anyone using Emacs to edit a document with
faces would probably use these commands very often.
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/29