Re: utf-8 cjk translation bug?

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>>  "using utf-8" means many things.  If they are using utf-8
>>  locale, I think they surely have those fonts.  But, as far
>>  as I know, ja_JP.UTF-8 is still not that popular in Japan.
>>  And, even in ja_JP.eucJP locale, people occasionally have to
>>  use utf-8 file for many reasons.

> Of course, but I assume they don't use Emacs in isolation and they
> probably would display such files in other ways sometimes.

Sometimes, Emacs is the only way (or, at least, the only way
he knows) to see files that are encoded in a way that his
locale doesn't support.

> Since we have to make the best of things which we probably
> can't get obviously right in all circumstances, I want to
> understand the context and I don't mean to argue with what
> you think is appropriate.

Yes, I understand your intention.

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden