Re: Window manager decorations

[Jason Rumney]

"Jan D." <address@hidden> writes:

> As I see it w32 also uses the FULLSCREEN_MOVE_WAIT emum value.  But
> is it really needed? Is x_check_fullscreen_move needed at all on
> w32?

I don't think so. That code was blindly copied from xterm.c.

> This will break w32 build, so I'd like to know how to fix it again
> (remove x_check_fullscreen_move or keep the renamed name in the
> generic frame structure).  BTW, I do not have the capability to
> build on w32.

I suggest removing the function and its callers from w32term.c.
If there is any need for a function like this on Windows, then we can
add it back, but it is likely to look different than the X version
anyway.