[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MML charset tag regression
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: MML charset tag regression |
Date: |
Fri, 30 May 2003 21:03:09 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>> So, for instance, if iso-8859-2 characters arrive at
>> Emacs with UTF8_STRING, they are decoded into the charset
>> mule-unicode-0100-24ff and treated differently (e.g. in
>> searching) than the characters of the charset iso-8859-2.
> That's actually customizable if it's a real problem.
Currently, even if we customize utf-fragment-on-decoding to
t, iso-8859-2 chars encoded in utf-8 can't be decoded into
latin-iso8859-2 charset because utf-fragmentation-table
contain only Greek and Cyrillic chars.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: MML charset tag regression, (continued)
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/26
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Dave Love, 2003/05/30
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Dave Love, 2003/05/25
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Jan D., 2003/05/25
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Dave Love, 2003/05/30
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/23
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Dave Love, 2003/05/25
- Re: MML charset tag regression,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Dave Love, 2003/05/25
- Re: MML charset tag regression, Kenichi Handa, 2003/05/23
Re: MML charset tag regression, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/23