[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: S-backspace
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: S-backspace |
Date: |
Wed, 28 May 2003 21:11:53 -0500 (CDT) |
>From my previous message:
So what about the following solution:
1. Explain the dangers in the relevant section of the Emacs manual.
2. Add C-M-S-<DEL> as a binding for backward-kill-sexp.
Of course, if one would do 2. , then one should tell people explicitly
that C-M-S-<backspace> is not a valid alternative under X, because that
kills the X server just as well as C-M-<backspace>.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: S-backspace, (continued)
- Re: S-backspace, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/28
- Re: S-backspace, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/28
- Re: S-backspace, Peter Lee, 2003/05/28
- Re: S-backspace, Oliver Scholz, 2003/05/29
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/29
- Re: S-backspace, David Kastrup, 2003/05/31
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/28
- Re: S-backspace,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: S-backspace, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/30
- Re: S-backspace, Kim F. Storm, 2003/05/30
- Re: S-backspace, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/05/30
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/30
- Re: S-backspace, Miles Bader, 2003/05/30
- Re: S-backspace, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/30
- Re: S-backspace, Miles Bader, 2003/05/30
- Re: S-backspace, Jan D., 2003/05/27
- Re: S-backspace, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/28
Re: S-backspace, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/27