[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: windmove and the minibuffer
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: windmove and the minibuffer |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2003 18:04:48 -0500 (CDT) |
Juanma Barrranquero wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2003 19:25:08 +0200, Alex Schroeder <address@hidden> wrote:
> Weird. Let me give you an exact script, to see whether your system
> really is different:
>
> Run emacs -q
> M-x windmove-default-keybindings
> C-x C-f (you should be in the minibuffer, now)
> S-up (you should be in *scratch*, now)
> S-down (I am still in *scratch*, eventhough I want to be in the minibuffer)
Yes, I go back to the minibuffer after the S-down.
"This is GNU Emacs 21.3.50.1 (i386-msvc-nt5.1.2600)
of 2003-05-27 on CASA"
(i.e., Emacs from yesterday's CVS HEAD, compiled on Windows XP with
Visual Studio .NET).
That *is* weird because I can reproduce he bug, in CVS downloaded just
moments ago. In fact, the following line is from the *Messages*
buffer immediately after the exercise:
windmove-do-window-select: No window at down
It is hard to see why this should be operating system dependent.
(emacs-version)
"GNU Emacs 21.3.50.89 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit)\n of 2003-05-27
on swt40.swt.com"
This is RedHat 7.2.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- windmove and the minibuffer, Alex Schroeder, 2003/05/26
- Re: windmove and the minibuffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/27
- Re: windmove and the minibuffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/05/28
- Re: windmove and the minibuffer, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/31
- Re: windmove and the minibuffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/31
- Re: windmove and the minibuffer, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/05/31
- Re: windmove and the minibuffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/31