[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME) |
Date: |
Mon, 26 May 2003 20:30:19 +0300 |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 14:20:54 +0900
>
> rms> It is important to have a way to edit the text that is
> rms> displayed. It is desirable but not very important to
> rms> preserve the first charset designation.
>
> That's assuming that it is text. This implementation would make
> corruption of attached binaries likely and signed messages somewhat
> likely
Aren't attachments clearly marked in the message as being such? Can't
Emacs look for those markers (the part delimiters in a multi-part
message) and refrain from decoding binary data while decoding text?
> Kai Grossjohann's answer to this (rename the presentation buffer to
> RMAIL, users rarely will want to see the full buffer, so it can be
> renamed to a "hidden" buffer name) is correct as far as I can tell
> from my own experience, convenient for the user, and easily
> implemented.
I see one significant disadvantage of this design: it will require
thorough rewrite of many parts in RMAIL, since the code as it is now
assumes a single buffer, narrowed as required. I don't have enough
information and experience to judge whether this is a serious
disadvantage, though.
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Richard Stallman, 2003/05/23
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/05/23
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Richard Stallman, 2003/05/24
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/25
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Richard Stallman, 2003/05/27
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/05/26
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/05/27
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Richard Stallman, 2003/05/27
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/05/27
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Richard Stallman, 2003/05/28
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Kenichi Handa, 2003/05/21
- Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/22
Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of one buffer? (for Rmail MIME), Richard Stallman, 2003/05/22