[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Various simple.el patches
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: Various simple.el patches |
Date: |
Wed, 14 May 2003 17:54:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> The idea that `oh, in _this_ situation, it works _backwards_,' not because it
> actually makes much sense, but (apparently) simply because that particular
> case is otherwise a no-op seems like a quick trip to a totally confusing user
> interface.
Well, err. I agree, too much dwimishness is dangerous. There was
precedent with C-t, though.
I think I'll keep my mouth shut, now. I mean, I have S-<backspace>
bound to kai-kill-whole-line, anyway...
What do people think about a kill-whole-line function that does like
C-a C-k C-k? I think it might be useful.
--
This line is not blank.
- Various simple.el patches, Stefan Monnier, 2003/05/13
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/14
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Miles Bader, 2003/05/14
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/14
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Miles Bader, 2003/05/14
- Re: Various simple.el patches,
Kai Großjohann <=
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/15
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/16
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/17
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/18
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/18
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/19
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/19
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/20
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/21
- Re: Various simple.el patches, Tak Ota, 2003/05/21