[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
address@hidden: Re: [Don Saklad <address@hidden>] How to correct or bypa
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
address@hidden: Re: [Don Saklad <address@hidden>] How to correct or bypass an error. Control-u f rmail in emacs onfencepost] |
Date: |
Sat, 03 May 2003 11:23:00 -0400 |
could a sendmail expert comment on whether or not unconditional "-t" in
mail/sendmail.el `sendmail-send-it' in the presence of Resent-* headers
is appropriate? my gut feeling is that this change was intended as
temporary, since the code is still there, just commented out. Gerd does
not remember the details.
background: the reported misbehavior is that `C-u f' in rmail on
fencepost results in the MTA signalling error (it does not accept
"Resent-*" headers when using "-t").
thi
------- Start of forwarded message -------
From: address@hidden (Gerd Moellmann)
Subject: Re: [Don Saklad <address@hidden>] How to correct or bypass an error.
Control-u f rmail in emacs on fencepost
Date: 03 May 2003 16:51:11 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
> i notice a 2001-03-21 change in emacs/mail/sendmail.el:
>
> * mail/sendmail.el (sendmail-send-it): Don't parse Resent-*
> headers. Always invoke sendmail with option -t.
>
> that seems to trigger the problem described below. was this change
> supposed to be temporary?
I'm sorry, but I don't remember a bit of this. Maybe some on
emacs-devel remembers.
------- End of forwarded message -------
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- address@hidden: Re: [Don Saklad <address@hidden>] How to correct or bypass an error. Control-u f rmail in emacs onfencepost],
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=