Re: address@hidden: Re: address@hidden: uniquify-ignore-buffers-re for gnus users?]]

[Stefan Monnier]

> Do people think this change would be a good idea?

Sounds good to me.  Ideally uniquify should detects such cases automatically,
but nobody has done the required coding, so until that happens setting
uniquify-ignore-buffers-re is a good compromise.


        Stefan


> ------- Start of forwarded message -------
> X-Now-Playing: Pole's _45-45_: "Arena"
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: Dan Jacobson <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: address@hidden: uniquify-ignore-buffers-re for gnus
>  users?]
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEWAj4xweXFQU1FhamFn
>  dG11g338WlKRAAACXElEQVR4nE2UQZPbIAyFtTPlHo3h3uL03ljsfVmUO0yt//9X+gTebJ2ZHPiQ
>  9PQkm3IdZrQeo5DMOErOmfb+psolcbRRo8h+5PnQvdPWilQVVa1y7HKB3JHCuMTmRPLxAjfa3i1Y
>  bEX1FPkffN5r6gEsmoIer1Ttl7GZCzKuleVY4IN+/E7DmBPIYI7tAkThpzcR7NYhA7CJrFThY7UX
>  bD6IyXIAvN1W3zgnSx1JRRzU8G0IJBgLI5dQ1v4FzLqXj9okC+2SnIROvQdygOsLvBOdirMePILH
>  BHB3L9D1GRBj6B6NeIXDgTDm4WDKXQCq9rxzd62XAoypVN2E7rL/WW1AL/WAEtxKEY94zoiOH1Rt
>  GEt1cBepfbaH+5j5GI9YI1KVhuIuNVy2JN60xY3urQGYe9inKR0DiGWjsrWEAvTtC2MmKvQ4tVrH
>  5b7OOaHHykr31B42Q6ZllhBRNSoV/luffm5XceOzaI0ArbDdUHqZDH+xmdpIkI9HeqWygYkgGQCu
>  DDTSPWb6OFRKowJNZ00YdpgGQMiIsQGw9ben9xjCzBXmngiJenDEuk3nwdEHtpsEIX5p+TKrGyu2
>  RGpae4bW3OBO58Dmw93yBU5bqoYHADwqVnrt5hqxD8uButZFkAl/gbe5DLqKQH5attuziddodbBX
>  hppl4kjRU+2tVGjtk5FL4DRr7CIlKsY51BuCjvH4xCvqQN1e99Q7pX4qNnSnvANETMbpVLaVA58H
>  ykiFU9ThtAaPT8nuLw6Afywwm2t92xdoOG/K8bl2zsFUVWKMRVPkcS1Xw3tQ2j/3Y8m+U/+P4wAA
>  AABJRU5ErkJggg==
> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 04:06:55 +0200
> In-Reply-To: <address@hidden> (Richard Stallman's
>  message of "Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:46:28 -0400")
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.4 required=5.0
>       tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
>             SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT
>       version=2.41
> X-Spam-Level: 
> 
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Do you want to add a recommendation for Gnus users to this doc string,
> > or perhaps change the default for the variable?
> 
> [...]
> 
> > uniquify-ignore-buffers-re's Documentation: *Regular expression
> > matching buffer names that should not be uniquified.  For instance,
> > set this to "^draft-[0-9]+$" to avoid having uniquify rename draft
> > buffers...
> >
> > Well, I wish the documentation would say what it should be for gnus users!
> 
> This buffer I'm writing in right now is called "*unsent wide reply to
> Richard Stallman*", and all the other Message buffers follow the same
> pattern, but the buffers change name from "*unsent..." to "*sent..."
> upon sending.  So perhaps changing the default value of
> `uniquify-ignore-buffers-re' to "^\\*\\(un\\)?sent " might be an idea.
> 
> But I've never used uniquify, so I'm not sure what uniquify users
> would expect.
> 
> - -- 
> (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
>    address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
> ------- End of forwarded message -------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
>