[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rationale for split-string?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Rationale for split-string? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:12:38 -0400 |
Unless you say you prefer to do it yourself, I will also submit a
patch against GNU Emacs CVS head, and audit the Lisp code in CVS head
to make sure there are no surprises from callers with non-default
SEPARATORS.
That would be very kind of you. To use the same code can't hurt, and
may help.
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, (continued)
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/23
- Re: Rationale for split-string?,
Richard Stallman <=