[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc.
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc. |
Date: |
10 Apr 2003 10:32:40 +0900 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Things measured in columns/lines are named as _CANON_WIDTH and
> _CANON_HEIGHT resp., while things measured in pixels are named as
> _PIXEL_WIDTH and _PIXEL_HEIGHT resp.
`_CANON_WIDTH' sounds annoyingly redundant; if that's the canonical
representation, then just use `_WIDTH,' and save additional adjectives
for exceptional cases.
Adding unnecessary verbosity simply makes the code more tedious (and
thus harder) to read.
[For the same reason, such adjectives _shouldn't_ be used in cases where
only one representation is possible by definition; e.g., the width of a
character in a font is obviously in pixels, so adding `_pixel' would be
unnecessary and harmful.]
-Miles
--
Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen
- Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kim F. Storm, 2003/04/09
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/09
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc.,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kim F. Storm, 2003/04/10
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/10
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kim F. Storm, 2003/04/10
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Miles Bader, 2003/04/10
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/10
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Richard Stallman, 2003/04/11
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/11
- Re: Code cleanup -- inconsistent "width" and "height" etc., Richard Stallman, 2003/04/11