[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISO-8859-1 encoded file names and UTF-8
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: ISO-8859-1 encoded file names and UTF-8 |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:28:00 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>> I don't understand the question. What would it mean to say this is
>> true?
> Changing the encoding of filename means that chaning the
> byte sequence of the name. For OS, that is just chaning the
> filename. And, my sample code recode-file actually calls
> rename-file internally.
> Ok, I guess this is a special case of changing the file name.
> Why do you ask?
The above is an OS's point of view. Users may not consider
that changing filename encoding is a special case of
rename-file. Even for you, the explanation was necessary.
So, I wanted to hear other people's opinions about which is
better; enhancing the existing rename-file directly (perhaps
by making use of the prefix argument), or making a new
command recode-file-name.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: ISO-8859-1 encoded file names and UTF-8, (continued)
Re: ISO-8859-1 encoded file names and UTF-8, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/20