Re: file-relative-name and remote files

[Kai Großjohann]

"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:

> IIRC it was called RFS (remote file system) and basically behaved
> more or less like the typical /net thingy, although the underlying
> system was different.
> IIRC Domain OS (i.e. Apollo's operating system) also had something
> special for /.. but since I've never used such a system I'd be surprised
> to remember correctly.

It seems that these are a bit esoteric, but maybe it's just my lack
of knowledge.

So is it okay for Tramp to interpret /address@hidden:/../local/name as
being the same as /local/name or should I change this?

-- 
A preposition is not a good thing to end a sentence with.