[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gratuitous changes
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: gratuitous changes |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:19:12 +0100 |
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:59:57 -0500
"Edward O'Connor" <address@hidden> wrote:
> so why don't we adopt a good and
> arguably more readable substitute for ?\ , say, ?\s?
>
> Ted, who thinks (setq foo ?\ ) looks strange
I like it. I find ?\ weird too, and ugly.
--
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
- Re: gratuitous changes, (continued)
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Robert Anderson, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Robert Anderson, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Nick Roberts, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Edward O'Connor, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Miles Bader, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/07
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/02/04