[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp]
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp] |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:39:59 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, address@hidden (Gerd Moellmann) writes:
> When current glyphs are reused, their positions are adjusted for the
> changes in the buffer since the glyphs were made current. The
> function try_window_id is one such example. I didn't see this being
> done for the new slot you added to struct glyph. (Insofar, the
> comment of struct glyph doesn't appear to be that devious :).)
Ah, thank you! That explains the strange behaviour I
noticed after I applied my patch, and is fixed by adjusting
buf_charpos in increment_row_positions. But...
> Be it as it may, I think I'd rather try to avoid enlarging struct
> glyph. Instead, I'd try using the function string_buffer_position in
> the cursor position computation. Strings aren't displayed frequently,
> so the additional function calls shouldn't matter, and anyway,
> enlarging glyphs costs performance too, and that in all cases.
Oops, I didn't know about string_buffer_position. You are
right. By using it, we can confine the change to
set_cursor_from_row as attached. The change was not that
straight, but I think it is better than the previous one.
The reason why the change looks complicated is to correctly
handle this kind of case where string_buffer_position is
confused by the same string used in display properties.
(setq s1 "<dot>")
(setq s2 "<comma>")
(setq c1 (propertize "." 'display s1))
(setq c2 (propertize "," 'display s2))
(insert c1 c2 c1 c2 c1 c2)
Could you check the change and comment again?
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
*** xdisp.c.~1.729.2.12.~ Thu Nov 7 15:24:40 2002
--- xdisp.c Wed Jan 29 15:54:27 2003
***************
*** 9369,9374 ****
--- 9369,9382 ----
{
struct glyph *glyph = row->glyphs[TEXT_AREA];
struct glyph *end = glyph + row->used[TEXT_AREA];
+ /* The first glyph that starts a sequence of glyphs from string. */
+ struct glyph *string_start;
+ /* The X coordinate of string_start. */
+ int string_start_x;
+ /* The last known character position. */
+ int last_pos = MATRIX_ROW_START_CHARPOS (row) + delta;
+ /* The last known character position before string_start. */
+ int string_before_pos;
int x = row->x;
int pt_old = PT - delta;
***************
*** 9384,9396 ****
++glyph;
}
while (glyph < end
&& !INTEGERP (glyph->object)
&& (!BUFFERP (glyph->object)
! || glyph->charpos < pt_old))
{
! x += glyph->pixel_width;
! ++glyph;
}
w->cursor.hpos = glyph - row->glyphs[TEXT_AREA];
--- 9392,9454 ----
++glyph;
}
+ string_start = NULL;
while (glyph < end
&& !INTEGERP (glyph->object)
&& (!BUFFERP (glyph->object)
! || (last_pos = glyph->charpos) < pt_old))
{
! if (! STRINGP (glyph->object))
! {
! string_start = NULL;
! x += glyph->pixel_width;
! ++glyph;
! }
! else
! {
! string_before_pos = last_pos;
! string_start = glyph;
! string_start_x = x;
! /* Skip all glyphs from string. */
! do
! {
! x += glyph->pixel_width;
! ++glyph;
! }
! while (glyph < end && STRINGP (glyph->object));
! }
! }
!
! if (string_start
! && (glyph == end || !BUFFERP (glyph->object) || last_pos > pt_old))
! {
! /* We may have skipped over point because the previous glyphs
! are from string. As there's no easy way to know the
! character position of the current glyph, find the correct
! glyph on point by scanning from string_start again. */
! Lisp_Object pos, limit;
!
! limit = make_number (MATRIX_ROW_END_CHARPOS (row) + delta);
! glyph = string_start;
! x = string_start_x;
! pos = make_number (string_buffer_position (w, glyph->object,
! string_before_pos));
! pos = Fnext_single_char_property_change (pos, Qdisplay, Qnil, limit);
! while (XINT (pos) <= pt_old)
! {
! /* Skip glyphs from the same string. */
! do
! {
! x += glyph->pixel_width;
! ++glyph;
! }
! while (glyph < end
! && EQ (glyph->object, string_start->object));
! if (glyph == end || !STRINGP (glyph->object))
! break;
! string_start = glyph;
! pos = Fnext_single_char_property_change (pos, Qdisplay, Qnil, limit);
! }
}
w->cursor.hpos = glyph - row->glyphs[TEXT_AREA];
- problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/28
- Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp], Gerd Moellmann, 2003/01/28
- Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp],
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp], Gerd Moellmann, 2003/01/29
- Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/29
- Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/29
- Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp], Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/29
- Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/30
- Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp], Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/30
- Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp], Gerd Moellmann, 2003/01/30
Re: problem of display property [Re: list-charset-chars and unicode-bmp], Dave Love, 2003/01/31