Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5

[Kim F. Storm]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     The above usage in pop.c does not seem correct to me -- aren't symbols
>     beginning with _ supposed to be reserved for the compilation system, to 
> avoid
>     conflicts such as this one?
> 
> Yes, I thyink that is true.  Perhaps we should change Emacs to use P
> instead of _P.  But that is a rather large change, albeit not a very
> deep one.

We already use P_ in most cases (under src/), and __P in a few other
cases (mostly under lib-src/ and lwlib/).

So it seems a bit odd that pop.c (as the only file) uses _P.

I suggest we simply change pop.c to use __P like the other files in
lib-src.

Shall I make that change?

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk