Re: silly face function names

[Kim F. Storm]

"Robert J. Chassell" <address@hidden> writes:

>    Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>    > There are a number of face manipulation functions in faces.el of the
>    > form `set-face-FOO-p'.  I think such names are misleading, ...
> 
> But even a few silly names should be fixed.  Our long term goal should
> be code that is clear and meaningful, not misleading or silly.  That
> means cleaning up previous silly messes.

In my subsequent mail, I agreed with Miles that we should obsolete the
silly named functions -- but *not* introduce new functions to replace them
as there is still an abundance of functions doing the same!

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk