[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cc-vars.el
From: |
Martin Stjernholm |
Subject: |
Re: cc-vars.el |
Date: |
22 Nov 2002 03:00:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> wrote:
> Yes, just like (defvar foo): it wouldn't define the function but would
> instead just declare that there exist such a function somewhere and
> that the byte-compiler should consequently not emit any warning about it.
This would suit me well, at least.
Are these declarations local to the current compilation? If not then I
think it'd be a good idea to make them so, to avoid that the warnings
are covered in packages that are compiled later on.
- Re: cc-vars.el, (continued)
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el,
Martin Stjernholm <=
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: cc-vars.el, Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/19