[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cc-vars.el
From: |
Martin Stjernholm |
Subject: |
Re: cc-vars.el |
Date: |
19 Nov 2002 22:58:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> /.../ A few extra fboundp checks at load-time are so utterly
> inconsequential that it's hardly worth worrying about the possibility that
> they might be generated in some cases.
What makes you think they are restricted to load time code?
> Do you have _real_ examples of a case where this method causes problems?
> If not, we shouldn't waste time wondering if there _might_ be some -- this
> simply isn't a very important issue.
I got bugged by users enough to come up with the whole cc-bytecomp
kludge, at least. What would be the problem of adding a macro in the
bytecomp environment to control the warning aspect only? That has to
be simpler than recognizing the if-form. It's not like it's an
either-or issue between two irreconcilable solutions.
- Re: cc-vars.el, Kenichi Handa, 2002/11/17
- Re: cc-vars.el, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/18
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/18
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/18
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/18
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el,
Martin Stjernholm <=
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Kim F. Storm, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Kim F. Storm, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/21