[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: find-aliases, where-did-you-go-little-command |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 22:49:49 +0100 |
On Wed, 06 Nov 2002 14:27:04 -0500
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> wrote:
> Some people (such as yours truly) like to read patches ;-)
I generally send patches, but I felt it'd be easier this way. Sorry.
> I'd use `fboundp' before calling indirect-function, so that ignore-errors
> shouldn't be necessary (and it also makes the loop significantly faster
> since you don't need to setup an error handler for each and every symbol).
Good idea, I'll try it as you suggest.
> I would hardcode it to t and not even bother with a customization.
That's what I'd rather do, but as it is a change wrt previous behavior,
I didn't want to impose my style. Anyway, there aren't that many aliased
commands, so even as default people won't see much difference.
> My minibuffer can't grow and can only show a single line, so I'm
> a bit annoyed by the ";\nand" part. I understand that for the "normal"
> case it's better. I'm not sure how to get the best of both worlds.
Me neither. Let's hear more opinions about that.
> Please try to stay within 80 columns. I know the original source doesn't,
> but that's just a good reason to try and fix it, rather than
> make it worse.
OK.
Thanks for your input,
--
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>