[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: plan for code freeze
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: plan for code freeze |
Date: |
19 Aug 2002 14:17:10 +0900 |
Karl Eichwalder <address@hidden> writes:
> W3 isn't required. If you are better off using w3m these days.
Well, in the sense of it being on average somewhat less sucky than w3,
yes.
But w3m is far from perfect, and it definitely feels much more `foreign'
in emacs [via w3m-el] than w3 does. I think a good, fast, w3 (or
something similar) is still a very worthwhile goal.
-Miles
--
Fast, small, soon; pick any 2.
- plan for code freeze, Stefan Monnier, 2002/08/13
- Re: plan for code freeze, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/14
- Re: plan for code freeze, Stefan Monnier, 2002/08/14
- Re: plan for code freeze, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/08/17
- Re: plan for code freeze, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/17
- Message not available
- Re: plan for code freeze, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/08/18
- Re: plan for code freeze,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: plan for code freeze, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/19
- Re: plan for code freeze, Alex Schroeder, 2002/08/19
- Re: plan for code freeze, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/20
- Re: plan for code freeze, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/08/26
- Re: plan for code freeze, William M. Perry, 2002/08/23
- Re: plan for code freeze, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/25
- Re: plan for code freeze, William M. Perry, 2002/08/28
- Re: plan for code freeze, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/29
- Re: plan for code freeze, Stefan Monnier, 2002/08/29
- Re: plan for code freeze, Sam Steingold, 2002/08/29