[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate? |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Aug 2002 13:28:13 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
>>>>> On Tue Aug 6, John writes:
> This was a patch I suggested for the eshell XEmacs package. I'm not
> certain it is appropriate for XEmacs, but I don't think it should
> have been installed in Emacs. I thought it had been rejected,
> rightly.
That's odd; I thought we had agreed to check them in. Why should the
XEmacs version diverge from Emacs? Emacs runs under cygwin also.
> Furthermore, `eshell-under-cygwin-p' is a misleading name: it should
> probably be `eshell-under-xemacs-cygwin-p' or similar.
Why?
> I don't understand why these changes were installed now, four months
> after they were suggested.
If you want them removed, I will remove them. It's been four months
because that's how long it's taken me to get back to my Emacs work.
John
- `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/06
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Wiegley, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Wiegley, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Paul Wallington, 2002/08/07
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/08
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, John Wiegley, 2002/08/09
- Re: `eshell-under-cygwin-p' etc. inappropriate?, Tak Ota, 2002/08/08