[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reducing defface redundancy
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: reducing defface redundancy |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:20:47 -0600 (MDT) |
If we have buffer-specific face attributes, or buffer-specific face
redirections, you could use them to give the minibuffer different
faces. Do you ever create a minibuffer window that is part of a
larger frame? If you do, would you be unhappy if the special face
definitions that you use for the minibuffer were effective there too?
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/07/03
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/03
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/03
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/08
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/07/08
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/09
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/09
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/09
- Re: reducing defface redundancy,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/11
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/07/11
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/12