[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apropos commands and regexps
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Apropos commands and regexps |
Date: |
Fri, 17 May 2002 09:22:31 +0300 |
> From: address@hidden
> Date: 17 May 2002 00:28:58 +0200
>
> > Isn't `igrep' an exception rather than a rule? That is, can you find
> > many more examples like this?
>
> ibuffer, iswitchb, kmacro, woman, ...
iswitchb doesn't really belong here.
Anyway, the reason I asked is that I'm afraid this rule will bring
many false hits, and I think we should beware of that as the plague.
I'd suggest to consider a list of synonyms instead: `buffer' could
have `ibuffer' and `iswitchb' listed there, for example. If that list
is maintained by a human, we can make sure it does TRT during
searches.
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, (continued)
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Miles Bader, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/17
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/18
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/19
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/19
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/19
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/19
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/15
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/16
- Message not available
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/12
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, D. Goel, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Alex Schroeder, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/17