[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x C-f RET problem...
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: C-x C-f RET problem... |
Date: |
17 May 2002 06:18:27 +0900 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> > I'm against this change, because
> > I use the current functionality (revisit-the-current-file) functionality
> > extremely often.
>
> I know habits are hard to change, but C-x C-v RET does that as well
Actually they do different things -- C-x C-f RET doesn't re-read the
file [which destroys various bits of state] unless (1) it's changed, and
(2) you answer yes to the prompt.
-Miles
--
Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!