[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-dat
From: |
Hrvoje Niksic |
Subject: |
Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 04:04:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i686-pc-linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> Despite the dialogs, I tend to run my other editor entirely from the
>> keyboard.
>>
>> In the Xemacs conmpletions buffer there is no hint of how to do this
>
> Doesn't it say something like
>
> In this buffer, type RET to select the completion near point.
>
> ?
It does -- this is what it looks like in XEmacs:
Click button2up on a completion to select it.
Type M-v or prior to move to this buffer, for keyboard selection.
Possible completions are:
[...]
XEmacs's keyboard selection in the completion buffer is even made to
more closely resemble to "traditional" model of selecting things --
for example, arrow keys move by items, not by characters in the
buffer. Try it out and you'll see what I mean.
- Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date), (continued)