[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: init_buffer PWD fix
From: |
宮下 尚:HIMI |
Subject: |
Re: init_buffer PWD fix |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 04:59:02 +0900 |
User-agent: |
T-gnus/6.15.4 (based on Oort Gnus v0.04) (revision 11) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.1 (i386-msvc-nt5.1.2600) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Meadow/1.99 Alpha1 (AWOFUCHI) |
MIYASHITA Hisashi(宮下 尚:HIMI) <address@hidden> writes:
> Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> It's not an obscure convention; it's in the POSIX standard.
>
> Also I've already said that in the previous mail.
Note that Windows never be POSIX2 compliant system.
Windows NT has POSIX subsystem that compliant to POSIX1,
never to POSIX2. Furthermore, the POSIX subsystem is not
fully compatible with W32 environment. Of course, Emacs
dose not use the subsystem.
from himi
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, (continued)
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix,
宮下 尚:HIMI <=
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/25
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24