[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: init_buffer PWD fix
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: init_buffer PWD fix |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:53:47 +0300 (IDT) |
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Paul Eggert wrote:
> PWD is unreliable on all platforms, but Emacs works around the problem
> with a similar method on all platforms by statting $PWD and ".", and
> using $PWD only if stat results agree. What is the problem with
> this workaround on Windows?
The problem is probably what you'd guess: the inode comparison doesn't
work on Windows as well as it does on Posix platforms...
But even so, I still don't see how this would cause a failure.
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/22
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/22
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/22
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/22
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/22
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/22
- Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/23
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Jason Rumney, 2002/04/22
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/23
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 永野圭一郎, 2002/04/22