[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: config.in
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: config.in |
Date: |
17 Apr 2002 14:08:19 +0900 |
"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
> > Should users use the CVS version of Emacs?
>
> We have anon CVS so they could. Quite a few do.
But those that do quite definitely fall into the class of `unusually
clueful users', even if they don't write any code. Such people are
quite competent to install the auto* tools; it's not rocket science.
In any case, the _purpose_ of the CVS repository is for development;
it's nice that `clueful' users can also use it to get the latest
sources, but that's a secondary purposes. The proper thing to do is to
optimize the situation fo _developers_, even if it means a slight extra
inconvenience for this special class of users.
In any case (as I noted before) due to the the timestamp problem, `mere
users' that use CVS are going to end up needing the auto* tools anyway,
even if they never modify a single file, _even if_ the auto-generated
files are in CVS.
-Miles
--
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath. At night the ice weasels come. --Nietzsche
- config.in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/16
- Re: config.in, Miles Bader, 2002/04/16
- Re: config.in, Colin Walters, 2002/04/16
- Re: config.in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/16
- Re: config.in, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/04/16
- Re: config.in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Colin Walters, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: config.in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/04/16
- Re: config.in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Miles Bader, 2002/04/16
- Re: config.in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Miles Bader, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Miles Bader, 2002/04/17