|
From: | Richard Stallman |
Subject: | Re: Should invisible imply intangible? |
Date: | Thu, 14 Mar 2002 05:42:53 -0700 (MST) |
I don't think it appropriate to hack intangibility into the invisible property just because intangibility happens to be missing an API that invisibility has. I have decided that something along these lines must be done.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |