[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should invisible imply intangible?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Should invisible imply intangible? |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Mar 2002 07:40:23 -0700 (MST) |
Also, as David Kastrup has mentioned repeatedly, intangible text tends
to break lots of things...
I don't think so.
For example: automatically move point to a visible area after each command
(and after post-command-hook, of course) or during redisplay (I believe
there is already such a feature for text with a `display' property).
If we can find some better way to move point out of certain text than
what `intangible' does now, perhaps we should redefine the meaning of
`intangible'. But I think it breaks only a few things, occasionally.
I think it is pretty good.
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?,
Richard Stallman <=