[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method
From: |
Per Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:24:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Removing the standard value mean you can no longer choose "Erase
> customization" from customize, but it ensures that the option is
> always saved.
>
> Is there some reason we want this always to be saved?
In general: If the standard value changes a lot, we might want to save
the option even if identical to the current standard value, as it
might not be identical to future standard values.
> What precisely would go wrong if you make t the standard value?
Even when there isn't any tool bar? That might work, a user might
want to tell Emacs never to turn on the tool bar, but is not likely to
tell Emacs to always turn on the tool bar, even when Emacs would not
do it by default.
Should I change the standard value for `menu-bar-mode' and
`tool-bar-mode' to t?
- Re: [PATCH] text-mode-hook-identify should be part of the standard value for text-mode-hook, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] text-mode-hook-identify should be part of the standard value for text-mode-hook, ShengHuo ZHU, 2002/02/13
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/05
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/07
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/12
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/13
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/12
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/12
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/12
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method,
Per Abrahamsen <=
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/13
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/14
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/17
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/17
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/19
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Pavel JanÃk, 2002/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/08