[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Feb 2002 12:15:13 +0200 (IST) |
On 3 Feb 2002, Kim F. Storm wrote:
> E.g. if I bind the following function to both [f1 a] and [f1 b],
> and enter f1 a f1 b, it reports ESC O P b (rather than ESC O P a):
>
> (defun f1x (arg)
> (interactive "kEnter key: ")
> (message (key-description (this-single-command-raw-keys))))
>
> But if this is really what it is also expected to do, then the
> documentation for the function is not correct as it doesn't mention
> the implications of using read-key-sequence. Eli?
It does seem like either a code bug or a documentation bug, but I
don't know which one ;-)
- Re: Questions round session management., Richard Stallman, 2002/02/01
- Re: Questions round session management., Tak Ota, 2002/02/01
- Re: Questions round session management., Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/01
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/01
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/02
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/02
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/10
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/11
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/04
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/04
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/04
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/05
Re: Questions round session management., Richard Stallman, 2002/02/01