Re: xml-lite.el

[Eli Zaretskii]

On 14 Jan 2002, Kevin A. Burton wrote:

> > I think the commentary needs some minor changes: it says the package is 
> > not part of GNU Emacs, and the $Revision: 1.24 $ is generally out of 
> > favor these days (it generates redundant changes because files are under 
> > CVS).
> <snip/>
> 
> Actually... I would highly recommend using $Id instead of $Revision.
> 
> Who says it is our of favor?

Like I said: it generates changes where there are none, which makes
Patch fail.  It's a nuisance.

We don't use such tags in Emacs, so there's no reason this one file
should be an exception.