Re: Macro CHECK_NUMBER?

[Stefan Monnier]

>    From: address@hidden (Pavel Janík)
>    Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:46:16 +0100
> 
>    >    >     #define CHECK_NUMBER(x, i) \
>    >    >       do { if (!INTEGERP ((x))) x = wrong_type_argument (Qintegerp, 
> (x)); } while (0)
>    > 
>    > [...]
>    > 
>    >    > If someone wants to remove them, at this point I would say ok.
>    > 
>    > I will take care of it.
> 
> While doing that: can I broke CVS compilation (and save *a lot* of
> commits/work) for about 20 minutes (for committing) or should I introduce
> temporary macros and do the real conversion twice without breaking the
> compilation? In both cases, I will do that completely on weekend...

I personally don't care if it's broken during a few minutes (after
all it can also happen mistakenly ;-), but I fail to see why it's
necessary:  you can commit all the files in one shot.



        Stefan