emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#70167: closed ([PATCH] Mark Flymake regions more accurately in lua-t


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#70167: closed ([PATCH] Mark Flymake regions more accurately in lua-ts-mode)
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:13:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:12:14 +0300
with message-id <865xwlr89t.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#70167: [PATCH] Mark Flymake regions more accurately in 
lua-ts-mode
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #70167,
regarding [PATCH] Mark Flymake regions more accurately in lua-ts-mode
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
70167: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=70167
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Mark Flymake regions more accurately in lua-ts-mode Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 12:55:33 -0500
Tags: patch

This changes the diagnostic region end position from being guessed
based on thing-at-point to using the one provided by LuaCheck. As
noted in bug#67152 it was already being matched but not used. I
couldn’t find anything where t-a-p guessed wrong but it seems
preferable to just mark exactly the same region as LuaCheck would.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#70167: [PATCH] Mark Flymake regions more accurately in lua-ts-mode Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:12:14 +0300
> Cc: 70167@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: john muhl <jm@pub.pink>
> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 11:45:05 -0500
> 
> 
> Changed to use push. It doesn’t look like the order matters or did
> I misunderstand something?
> 
> Thanks for the review.

Thanks, I installed this on the master branch, and I'm closing the
bug.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]