bug#31132: closed (AUCTeX, RefTeX and biblatex's multicite commands)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 09 Apr 2024 22:33:11 +0200
with message-id <m2frvup988.fsf@macmutant.fritz.box>
and subject line Re: bug#31132: AUCTeX, RefTeX and biblatex's multicite commands
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #31132,
regarding AUCTeX, RefTeX and biblatex's multicite commands
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
31132: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31132
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> AUCTeX, RefTeX and biblatex's multicite commands
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:35:39 -0300
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
>
>
>
>
> From TeX.SX: https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/425883/105447
>
>
> RefTeX's relations biblatex's multicite commands (such as \parencites, 
> \footcites, \textcites and so on) leave some things to be desired for. 
> Namely, they do not seem to be recognized as citation commands. This 
> results in RefTeX's `reftex-view-crossref` (C-c &) returning "Not on a 
> crossref macro argument". Also, in adding an extra bibkey to an already 
> existing multicite command, it is not possible to access RefTeX's 
> facilities.
>
> Arash Esbati generously provided patches at TeX.SX that go a long way in 
> dealing with these problems. However, support for the presence of global 
> optional arguments (between parentheses) is still missing. At their 
> request, I write to report this issue.
>
> So, I kindly request that this issue be addressed when opportune.
>
>
> With my warmest thanks for the great software,
>
> gusbrs
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#31132: AUCTeX, RefTeX and biblatex's multicite commands
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 09 Apr 2024 22:33:11 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
>
>
>
>
> gusbrs <gusbrs.2016@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I think so too, this one is good to close. Once again, thank you very
> > much!
>
> You're welcome, and thank you for your support.  I think we will go on
> with discussion about your proposals on auctex-devel.  For now, I'm
> closing this report.
>
> Best, Arash
>
>
> --- End Message ---